Sharing Life — Abortion, Stem Cells, Euthanasia, Intelligent Design, Reproduction Technology

October 5, 2005

Endnotes Part 3: Death of a Child

Filed under: Death

7. Taken from www.priestforlife.org and its homepage link entitled: America Will Not Reject Abortion Until America Sees Abortion

8. In the immediate aftermath of Roe v. Wade, a number of Supreme Court decisions moved toward a position that any interference in the right to abort was undue interference. After a number of conservative judicial appointments to the Court, pro-life advocates hoped Roe v. Wade would be overturned with the case of Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania ( ) 505 U.S., at 871. Instead, the Court continued to find a constitutional right of Abortion. The Court did however state that the States had a “substantial interest” in potential human life throughout pregnancy, and that federal courts were not to require the States to satisfy the highest level of proof to justify restrictions on abortion. (This highest level of proof is that of proving a “compelling state interest” to satisfy a “strict scrutiny” by the Court.)

9. To Be Inserted

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://life.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/endnotes-part-3-death-of-a-child/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>























Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here