Endnotes to Part 2: Death of a Child
1.WorldNetDaily, posted January 17, 2005 www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42422
2. On February 22, 2005 the Supreme Court refused to hear Norma McCorvey’s appeal. The lower court (5th Circuit Court of Appeals) stated that it was too late to review a 30 year old decision, an outcome McCorvey surely anticipated. Yet, one judge on the 5th Circuit, although concurring with the opinion, stated that “one may fervently hope” that the Supreme Court would revisit Roe and its 1992 abortion ruling in Planned Parenthhod v. Casey (2004) 505 U.S. 833. Los Angeles Daily Journal, Feb. 23, 2005, Vol. 118, No. 36, Page 1.
3. Los Angeles Daily Journal, Feb. 23, 2005, Vol. 118, No. 36, Page 1.
4. Matthew 13:12 - For to him who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away.
5. Citation to be provided
6. The trial court evidence was that other, less gruesome, and just as safe or safer abortion procedures existed. Yet the court accorded almost complete discretion of the physician and patient to decide to use the procedure.
