Sharing Life — Abortion, Stem Cells, Euthanasia, Intelligent Design, Reproduction Technology

October 5, 2005

Endnotes to Part 6: Death of a Child

Filed under: Death

22. The majority opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart seized on this logical and ethical inconsistency in the Nebraska law. Justice Stevens, in joining the majority overturning the partial birth abortion law, chided the dissenters by stating (I think truthfully): “For the notion that either of these two equally gruesome procedures performed at this late stage of gestation is more akin to infanticide than the other, or that the State furthers any legitimate interest by banning one but not the other, is simply irrational.”

23. We as a citizenry are in denial or ignorance of own passive complicity in D&E abortions. D&X (“partial birth” abortion” seems to have shocked much of the citizenry because the procedure brings the victim into visibility as the child is “delivered” through the birth canal except for the skull. This same child if dismembered within the uterus can be killed without restriction. The mere movement of this person from the womb to partial visibility outside the womb is hardly a rational basis to confer or withhold the right to life.

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://life.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/endnotes-to-part-6-death-of-a-child/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>























Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here