Sharing Life — Abortion, Stem Cells, Euthanasia, Intelligent Design, Reproduction Technology

October 5, 2005

Endnotes to Part 9: Death of a Child

Filed under: Death

24. The decision includes some restriction on abortion in late term pregnancies. The restriction has been interpreted by later abortion decisions by the Court in a way that guts the restriction of any force or meaning. A states restriction on abortion must allow an exception for the “health” of the mother. “Health” concerns are to be decided by her physician exclusively, and include her emotional health. Therefore, an abortionist physician can justify any abortion, and generally does so. The interest is likely not the health interest of the mother, but the financial interest of the abortion clinic.

25. The Supreme Court has avoided the question of “justified homicide” by ignoring the question of the humanity of the fetus and by implicitly treating the unborn fetus as a legal non-person.

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://life.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/endnotes-to-part-9-death-of-a-child/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>























Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here